Evaluate how you respond to vacancies
A review is the very first impression. It is what influences the editor’s or someone else’s decision to answer you or not, whether to give you a test, or whether you are suitable for working on a project. Many articles have been written about this, but so far they have not helped. The last time I was looking for authors, I received about 300 reviews. And the average number was about 10-15%.
There is a simple algorithm that helps you compose a normal response. It consists of just three steps:
Step 1. Carefully read the vacancy and write in the review what they expect from the performer. For example, they are looking for a blog writer with experience in the marketing topic who will be able to work full-time. So it is important israel rcs data to: a) show experience - that is, provide examples of articles on the topic; b) indicate that you are ready for full-time employment from a certain date. Or another example: they are looking for a writer who can easily switch from one topic to another and writes quickly. If such requirements suit you, then you need to provide several examples of work on different topics and indicate how long it took to prepare each material.
You don't need to come up with creative ideas, write in verse, and tell half of your life. I can say for sure: there are so few normal, calm reviews that they stand out from the rest. And this is the best way to draw attention to yourself.
How to understand what should be included in a job application
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2024 6:52 am