Then something unexpected happened. As a result of both the financial crisis and the digital revolution, the industry first fell into a crisis that was barely noticed, then experienced with dismay, threatening its very existence. And with that, the distribution battles intensified, especially because the SRG, which is funded mostly by fees, was much less affected by these developments.
In recent years, this has led to a partially unholy alliance india rcs data of political and economic opponents of the SRG who want to overturn the existing system. On the one hand, there is the fundamentalist No-Billag movement, end to the SRG, because without fees, no public television can function. The second approach is only somewhat more subtle, with which the SRG is being attacked in its basic understanding by massively curtailing its range of services by parliamentary decision.
Under the nebulous term of the subsidiarity principle, politicians, most of whom have no idea about the refinancing options available for private television in our country, want to define a catalogue of broadcasting areas that the SRG must withdraw from in order to make room for offers from other domestic broadcasters. Since the political climate in most socio-political areas is becoming increasingly gloomy, this approach could lead to dangerous deterioration with long-term damage.