Well, I don't know where you see the difference between humans and machines. Between you personally and the robot. It also depends on how you like to see yourself. Quite a few people are only happy when they feel perfect, in the Cayenne or at the latest grill machine; they would love to be a machine themselves, running smoothly, without any problems japan rcs data and without any questions. Only now and then do these people read about striking advances in robots and the like - and they ask themselves anxiously: Is artificial intelligence catching up with humans? Is it even overtaking us?
"Why would it want that?" is all I can ask. The machine can do what it can perfectly. To catch up with humans would mean becoming imperfect, prone to failure, sometimes in love, sometimes drunk, desperate, dreamy, etc. Thanks to clever software, a machine can of course pretend, but that would be pretty laughable - about as laughable as if people pretended to be perfect. They then seem like idiots, like robots who can't think of anything other than a program and who never fail. What Stan Wawrinka had tattooed on his forearm is particularly human: "Always tried. Always failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." Samuel Beckett.