Terms used in this debate space can seem threatening, such as:
Starting with my data sharing/archivist hat on, my professional role is to promote the sharing of data, context and methods to support the re-use of public research resources. In this vein, I have spent over thirty years evangelising on the sharing of qualitative data leading this strand of work for the UK Data Service, and Qualidata before that, dating back to 1994.
The UK is seen as a leader in archiving iran rcs data qualitative data, with methods which are mature in practice and culture. I do believe that every researcher can share something from their methods and data, and that we do need to be ready to come up with positive arguments and solutions to calls for replication.
We cannot have failed to note the increasing drive for openness and sharing, value and transparency in our daily lives. GDPR and open access, as well as concerns about how data has been used in referendums and elections have all raised public awareness of this drive.
Funders, Professional Societies and Journals are also driving open research mandates. The 2007 OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding (PDF), declared data as a public good, prompting a swathe of action.