One of the following options occurs:

[sumaiyakhatun27]

This is what gives rise to "clones", when the sites seem to be different, and the content seems to be different, but is very similar. This happens because instead of a chain: Defining the target audience of the site. Initial collection of interest groups, selection of suitable ones, competitor analysis. Site structure, distribution of interest groups across pages. In-depth analysis of each interest group, page planning.


Creating a page. Improving the page after accumulating statistics. qatar email list We take from a couple of competitors and do the same. We order texts at a lower price, and take photographs from Google or someone else’s website. It is with the text that most people screw up. It's not that good, or even decent copywriting, doesn't come cheap. Because to get a good text you need either the interest of a copywriter, or clear technical specifications + an example of “how to do it”.


Without this, for a small price, the customer (web studio or website owner, it doesn't matter) will receive at best a summary from a couple of sources, and at worst - a rewrite of the site that the copywriter stumbled upon. And this is not because copywriters are bad. But because everyone wants to earn a decent living. For a cheap order with an unclear technical task, no one will delve into the topic, make an article plan, select cool sources, determine the target audience for the customer.