Determine whether all elements

[muniyaakter]

Comparison Process Exact Match: of the patent claim are present in the infringing product or process. Functional Equivalence: Assess whether the infringing features perform the same function in the same manner to achieve the same result as the patent claims. The Doctrine of Equivalences Substantial Similarity: Even if there are minor differences, evaluate whether the differences are insubstantial and do not change the essential nature of the patented invention. Function-Method-Result: Ensuring that the alleged product meets the function, method, and result criteria to qualify under the Doctrine of Equivalences. 5.4.


2. Use of Claims Charts Creation of a Demand Chart Mapping Claims to Features palau b2b leads Develop detailed claim charts that align each patent claim element with the corresponding feature of the infringing product. Visualization: Use tables, diagrams, and notes to clearly illustrate the overlap between patent claims and features of the accused product. Analysis and Documentation Comprehensive Coverage: Ensuring that all aspects of the patent claims are addressed in the claim charts, leaving no gaps in the comparison. Evidence Integration: Incorporate supporting evidence, such as expert opinions and technical analyses, into claim charts to reinforce the overturned claim.