With that caveat, the faster behavioural repertoires were associated with greater socioeconomic disadvantage and environmental harshness as is predicted by life history theory, although experiencing parental death, living away from home before age 17 and exposure to air pollution significantly reduced the chances of adopting a “fast” strategy.
Overall, my research suggests that individual cambodia rcs data socioeconomic position is a stronger predictor of breastfeeding than environmental quality, but that the two are strongly linked and exert their own independent effects.
The effects of the local environment are, however, complex and depend on which indicators of environmental quality are used. Associations are not driven by individual environmental perception as much as they are by more objective measures of environmental quality. environmental quality do not adequately explain the socioeconomic gradient in breastfeeding, suggesting that, in the UK context at least, sociocultural environmental factors are likely to have an important influence on breastfeeding outcomes. Although exact pathways and mechanisms remain unclear, intervening at the environmental level has the potential to improve breastfeeding behaviour, as well as other health and reproductive outcomes.